Monday, June 8, 2015

#NationalBestFriendDay: Social Media Campaign to Recognize Best Friends (because the whole world needs to know, not just them)

Well dear readers, on this, my last blog post for my class, I must admit, I'm kinda going to miss it. It's been fun ranting and raving my thoughts on here for you to see, and I'll actually be a bit sad once it's over. However, it's not quite over yet; I do have one more....

So, this morning as I logged into Facebook, I noticed its top trend was actually a hashtag, which kind of threw me off. Facebook does use hashtags, but not nearly as much as Twitter, who invented the concept and has pretty much cornered the market on it. That's why it is slightly unusual to see one of Facebook's top trends as a hashtag event, rather than a more "newsly" (is that a word?) event, such as something political or controversial. Upon further investigation into the subject (and by that I mean clicking on the trend link to get a description) I was able to figure out why Facebook was so eagerly utilizing the hashtag on this of all days. Both Facebook and Twitter are taking part in this #NationalBestFriendDay trend, self-identifying it as a "social media campaign" which basically means they're taking the lead on this, and both promoting and expanding member usage throughout the day; even those who are once-a-weekers when it comes to Facebook are taking to their pages to show some love for their BFFs, because they're terrified of being left out of the trend (after all, it is only a one day thing)

 On Facebook...


 and Twitter.


Amazing how crazy one little trend can make us, isn't it? I logged into my Facebook at 11 am, and already hundreds of thousands of people had posted about their best friends with the hashtag. Not only that, but several of my own friends had flooded my news feed with pictures of them and their besties, along with several large paragraphs going on to explain why exactly the love them. And I guess I shouldn't make fun - I fully intend to do the same thing when I've finished this post, but it's just the concept of how quickly a trend can spead. It's like wildfire.

And to make it easier for us (in case we're unable to post paragraphs upon paragraphs about our besties) other sites are making it easier for us. In an article titled "20 Best Friend Day Quotes to Share on Social Media and Text", the iDigitalTimes literally outlines a handful of quotes you can text to your best friend, or post alongside any embarrassing pictures you might put up on social media with them from years ago. It's crazy; now if you can't think of anything to say, the internet will find a way to say it for you. And despite that some people just don't have a way with words, they all still want to take part in this, because it is a trend that will be over and gone before they know it - and god forbid they be one of the only people that didn't do it, especially when their best friend did it for them. That can definitely cause some tension, and the claws will come out...

Meowww,
  - Robyn

P.S. Here is that picture of me and my best friend, as promised, despite not having a giant paragraph next to it -- no words are needed for this guy. The best snuggle buddy ever :) Miss you Lambeau!


Sunday, June 7, 2015

The 90's Kids Last Hope: Joseph Gordon-Levitt

If you're around the same age as me, you'll more than likely remember the 90's, or at least a piece of them. And as a kid during the 90's, you'll also more than likely remember the only people of the 90's who mattered to us. 

Sure, this guys's face came up a lot in the media...




.... and it wasn't just cause he was "one hecukuva President", but because of relations he had with Monica Lewinsky (one of the Top 10 Mistresses according to TIME magazine) while he was President.


But we were kids! We had no idea why the media was talking about them so much, or why the hell her blue dress was so important...


The people who were important to us were these guys!!



               

                     


WARNING. Images beyond this point may destroy your childhood. Proceed with caution.

Annnnd yet, despite such promising careers in the 90's.... here's where they are now;


             



                                                                             
That hits me, right in the childhood. So not okay. 

All of the sudden, even this guy doesn't look so bad...


.... and he lied to the entire nation about an extramarital affair.

So what hope do we still even have for our beloved 90s stars? Oh sure, some are getting treatment, and some never even got into alcohol or drugs, but sort of just, faded out, in terms of their career.

BUT, in an effort to redeem the memories of my childhood, I'd like to direct our thoughts to this guy...



One can argue his "downhill" phase was during the 90s based on that hair alone - but even then Joseph Gordon-Levitt was cracking us up on 3rd Rock From the Sun as the sarcastically lovable Tommy Solomon.

And since then? I'd say he's doing okay. He was nominated for 3 SAG awards by the time he was 18, and nominated for two Golden Globes by the time he turned 30; he portrayed the future Robin; played Abraham Lincoln's oldest son; wrote/starred in/directed his own film; founded his own production company (which won an Emmy award last year); and has had a successful relationship with a woman for two years before deciding to put a ring on it in a private ceremony in 2014. My favorite part of all of that? The absence of the words "drugs", "prison", "plastic surgery", "arrested", "alcohol" or any other words of the like that would be all too common on the wikipedia pages of the other four former child stars I mentioned. I will confess, however, that JGL did decide to drop out of school (Columbia University) to focus on his acting and directing careers. Although, I for one certainly can't tell him he made a bad decision....

And don't even get me started on his character in Treasure Planet. Animated or not, he was cuuute *swoon*


Have mercyyyy;
   - Robyn

Political Activism... Does that mean I have to be active?

So here's my biggest pondering as of late; today's society, thanks to the wonders that are smartphones, tablets, and social media, has a lack of desire by all young people to go outside (unless it's "out" to a bar or a club). We are couch potatoes now more than ever - especially with the allure of Netflix, Facebook and Candy Crush constantly calling our names... We don't even stand a chance.

So in a society where young people are more concerned with what's "trending" than with what's "news" how are we to not only keep up to date with, but even interested in, politics? We hardly give them a second thought, unless a politician does something overtly stupid; as in the recent case of Presidential candidate Rick Santorum (ironically enough a devout Catholic) and what he said to Pope Francis...




Yup.
He didn't even know that the reigning authority of his own church - the world leader of the largest Christian church on the planet - had a background in science, despite it being public knowledge.
And this is the guy who wants to run our nation....




  
Or perhaps it crosses our news feed if a politician shows their support or detest of a celebrity who's currently trending among young people for something scandalous (such as Mike Huckabee with the Josh Duggar scandal or Lindsey Graham's supportive words for Caitlyn Jenner). But even then, do we have any idea about these political figures outside of these news stories? I myself admit that I have heard political figures either back or attack a celebrity's actions (sometimes stupid, sometimes not), and it's changed my view of that politician and whether or not I would ever vote for them -- and I did so without even knowing anything about that politician's core beliefs, but rather focused solely on what they said or did about the celebrity's scandal.

I know I can't be the only one that's done this. Nowadays. "activism" is anything but, at least for most of our generation. The only way in which I have to be active about my feelings towards a politician for how they've reacted to a scandal is simply not vote for them, or go about posting hateful or slanderous things about them on the internet - perhaps even in some extreme cases, beginning an online petition to get them removed from office (I've never gotten as extreme as either of the last two things, but I've seen it all too many times). All of these things enable us to speak our mind or fight for change from the comfort of our own couch. It shouldn't even be called activism anymore, really, when the only "active" part is our fingers getting the exercise of furiously posting their newfound disapproval for the politician in question. To this day (apart from the one time I did withdraw my support from a politician I hadn't really supported in the first place) I don't really engage in political activism, although perhaps I should. Activism is something that is meant to be done for the greater good, not simply to cause harm, or discredit someone over the internet. In fact, the above meme of Rick Santorum and my beloved Francis is the first inkling of political favoritism (or rather, de-favoritism) that I've shown in a really long time, perhaps even since that first incident I had, of refusing to vote for the man I already had no intention of voting for.

And you know the most ironic thing of all? I keep referring to him as "that politician" or "that man" because I cannot for the life of me remember who it was, or what it was they did that made me dislike them so strongly. And that's the culture that we live in today; we have become invested in a media circus -- we get our tickets to see the show, but instead of paying with money, we pay with our interest. We live in a world full of scandals where we milk each one for all that they're worth, and once we've done all we can with it - once that act of the show has ended - we move onto the next act of the show. And the next one, and the next one, and the next one...


... and the show goes on;
  - Robyn

Thursday, June 4, 2015

Convergence, Part 2 - Attack of the Pack

Hello, dear readers. Some of you may recall my earlier post about convergence, and what it means in today's society. Today's post is somewhat of a sequel to that piece, but instead of defining what convergence is, this time I've actually got an example of it, and a current one at that. 

Now, what brought this to mind for me were all the ads playing for Pitch Perfect 2 lately, and the fact that in some of them, I saw none other than Clay Matthews (and upon further investigation, four other Packers players and Aaron Rodgers' little brother). I recalled seeing something trending in my Facebook news feed a few months earlier about this happening (because I'm a fan of the Packers on Facebook and we all know from my last post how Facebook loves to personalize our feeds) but it was quickly forgotten amidst all the other not-even-remotely-important-but-still-completely-engrossing occurrences in my Facebook world.

Now that my mind has returned to the subject, I once again find myself connecting it to convergence. Ever since I've learned about it, I honestly believe my mind has begun looking for it absolutely everywhere. However, in the case of the Packers meeting the Barden Bellas, it's legitimate. The concept of two different types of media -- one a film, the other a televised sport -- coming together to form something that otherwise wouldn't have come about had they not meshed; or rather, had they not {wait for ittt} converged! See, the concept is everywhere! Check it out for yourself in a piece of the "Pitch Perfect Packers" example:



Now, let's be honest -- would this have ever even been considered as an idea twenty years ago? How about ten? The media is constantly changing, always trying to up its game, despite the fact that they pretty much rule over everything; media no longer has any real competition in terms of how people spend their time. And it seems that it'll be that way for awhile, especially if media keeps allowing people to come up with ideas like this.

And fun fact: Did you know the combination of the film and the team started, of all places, on Twitter? Yup. By way of a series of exchanges between the producers and the team an agreement was reached, and what we are left with is the finished product. The movie thus far has gotten mixed reviews, but more have praised the movie than condemned it. And let's not forget -- it debuted #1 at the box office on opening weekend, beating the second place film by almost $30,000,000... that's a lottt of zeros folks. Clearly, convergence pays, as it keeps growing more and more popular.

Needless to say, I for one am beyond excited to see the movie, regardless of the mixed reviews. I thoroughly enjoyed the first one, and not only does this one have most of the original cast, but it now has the Green Bay FREAKIN Packers too. You know who's going into that movie with a bucket of popcorn bigger than her head and a drink the size of a big gulp?



Singing (and signing) off for now,
 - Robyn

P.S. Another fun fact: football season's only 90 days away :)

Wednesday, June 3, 2015

The Trend of Trending

Nowadays the most important part of social media is making sure you're a part of social media. Adults, young adults in particular, are obsessed with keeping up with the latest news and trends that circulate throughout social media. If it's new and everyone else is doing it, you can bet your ass they will be too.

There are two common types of trends nowadays:

- Long term, or more permanent
AND
- Short term, or more temporary

Long term social media are things like websites and apps for your smartphone or tablet, such as Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, Snapchat, and others of the like -- essentially they're those things that take up the biggest part of our time whenever we're on our phones.



These four (and many others) are the outlets through which we are able to view and take part in the shorter term trends, which often have a very short life expectancy, as opposed to the longer term trends.

These are things like the ALS Ice Bucket Challenge;





Or the Kylie Jenner Lip Challenge (which, if you didn't know, is a horrible idea - basically turns you into a character from Monsters Inc);





Or the debate over the color of one simple dress (and for the record, neuroscientists discovered the answer: it's blue).
  




The interesting thing is that the longer term trends seem to be focused more on us - on Facebook and Twitter it's all about updating our status, and Instagram and Snapchat are about sharing pictures of what we are doing.



The shorter term trends, however, seem to be about others, and how we can take part in them; the ALS Ice Bucket Challenge, the Kylie JennerLip Challenge, and the "is it blue or is it gold?" debate over the dress -- all are trends that stemmed from other people, that we then ingrained ourselves into. And, once we have exhausted the trend and it no longer benefits or focuses on us, we move on to the next one just as quickly as we'd jumped onto the bandwagon with the previous ones.


No wonder the older generation is always wagging their fingers at us...

Picture

Tsk tsk tsk...
  - Robyn

Thursday, May 14, 2015

Online Ethnography

HERinteractive
            For my online ethnography, I chose to use a community that was somewhat close to my heart, and one that I had (passively) been a member of for the past fifteen years or so. HERinteractive is a gaming company that, for the past twenty years, has created more than thirty computer games centered around everybody’s favorite girl detective, Nancy Drew. I’ve been playing the games since I was little, and vaguely remember when the second game came out (when the first came out I was only three, so I definitely don’t remember that one). The games may “technically” be designed for young girls, but at the ripe age of twenty-two, I still find myself playing them as avidly as ever, and plan one day to play them with my daughter, if I have one. Because of my love for the games, I have always been a passive observer/member of the HERinteractive webpage, occasionally browsing through the fan-forums and even keeping up with their Facebook fan page. However, more recently, I have been keeping up more and more with what’s going on with not only the company, but its other fans, particularly because of a few issue that have been happening between the two. I’d always resisted becoming an official member of the website, for fear that my constant posting in forums would keep me from homework, but for the sake of the assignment, I’m glad I became one. And yes, it most definitely kept me from doing my homework (although since this is for a class that makes it okay… right?)
            Because of my official member christening that came as a part of this project, I was able to actively be involved in the Nancy Drew fan community, which was really great. As I mentioned, I had been keeping up more and more recently because of a lot of issues the fans have been having with the games, and I was glad for this assignment to have the opportunity to delve further into it, and learn more about the issues the community had, as well as the community itself. The community itself, which is made up of more than 99,880 members at last count (though I wouldn’t be surprised if they surpass 100,000 before the end of the month) is one made up of the games’ most loyal fans. The company’s Facebook page has another 171,355 “likes” which further shows the popularity of the franchise. The Facebook page has the ability to reach a much wider audience, since Facebook is available to pretty much anyone in any country, while the HERinteractive website is US based. There are still certainly fans from all over the world, but the majority are red-blooded American females, grateful for the site as a place to come together and geek out about the games – myself included. And this is the major purpose of the website, apart from buying the games and merchandise, for fans to be able to come together and discuss anything they want to on the forums. In my first look-through of the site as an official member, I noticed one thing in particular that I was very grateful for. All the different possible topics were separated into their own specific forum; for instance, each game has its own individual forum, with a handful of other forums for particular things, such as suggestions for the people at HER, fan blogs, a “writer’s cabin” where fans can post their own fan-fics, a spoilers forum, and even a forum for just rumors, where fans can post speculations, but no spoilers are allowed, which I personally think is a great idea, to separate the two.
            Once I had familiarized myself with the setup of the site, I dove right in. After creating an account (say hello to “robyn.birdie”) I was ready to go. Now, I already knew a lot about how the site worked since I had been visiting it more recently, the reason being because of changes made by the company, both in management and certain aspects of the game. Many fans have been less than satisfied with the more recent games, and this is largely believed to be from a management change, from what I gathered from the message boards. The specific aspects of the games that had been changing were believed to be decisions made by the new management, which upset fans all the more. Many seemed upset by the fact that they had been loyal followers of the series for 32 games now, and someone brand new and unaffiliated with the games had come in and changed quite a few things that seemed to be staples of the games. Specifically, a few of the things I could find that fans were most upset about were changes to the settings of the games, the realistic aspect of them, the amount of “busy work” involved, and (perhaps most notably) the fact that the company had fired the woman who had voiced the character of Nancy Drew for the past 32 games. It wasn’t clear to me whether or not HER had revealed who they had chosen to replace the last one (a woman named Lani Minella) but regardless, fans seemed to be extremely pissed about the situation – not just upset, but blatantly angry. It was interesting to see, given that while some fans are around my age, others are much younger, and to see them so vocally angry about it was surprising. I think that’s part of technology, though – the idea that teens can use the internet as an outlet to get angry or upset, without the person on the other end actually knowing who they are. What I saw on HERinteractive was a prime example of this.
            While I find myself agreeing with the anger others feel about the firing of the voice of Nancy Drew, I’m afraid that our efforts to tell HER how we feel will be null. More recently fans have become very vocal about another issue that they’ve found. About five years ago, the company “remastered” their very first game, as a kind of 20th anniversary celebration. This made fans ecstatic, because the first two games in the series cannot be played on newer computers, due to differences in the sound settings. However, because fans were so happy to get the first game remastered, the also called for the second game to be redone as well. Because HER’s games are offered both through CD-rom and digital download, every game was now available for purchase and use on newer computers… except for that second game. Fans began countless threads begging HER to consider remastering the second game, and from what I found, I counted at least ten petitions to have it remastered (though I’m sure there have been far more). I myself signed all of the petitions I could find, because the second game was the very first one I had ever played, and I had a soft spot for it in my heart. However. I also found in my research, that the representatives of HER had released a statement about a year ago stating that they had no plans to remaster the game, and fans everywhere erupted with outrage, as I saw in the fact that the threats about and petitions for it to be done have not stopped. The issue I see with it, however, is that because fans have been calling for a remaster of this game for more than five years and have yet to get it, I fear also that the fans calling for the rehiring of Lani as the voice of Nancy will also not get their wish. The insistence of HER that they would not remaster the second game still didn’t deter fans, though, so I’m certain they will continue to call for the rehiring of Lani until they either get their wish, or make the decision to boycott the games altogether.
            Although I’ve always been a fan of the games, and a person on the outside looking in (when it came to the fansite), it is certainly a much different experience when it comes to being a part of the online community. You find plenty of people who share your exact point of view, others who disagree with it entirely, and even some who make you think of something you had never previously even considered. I've really enjoyed my time so far in the community, and I do think I’ll continue to be a part of it after I turn this assignment in. It’s not only a great way to stay up-to-date on the latest news about the games, but it also gives me a place to speak my mind where I know there are at least a handful of others who feel the same way. Not only is it beneficial to me to feel like a part of the community, but there are constant movements for change within the company that stem from the forums, and although HER’s response to our call for a remastering of the second game wasn’t the response we wanted, we continue to push for it. And even if it never happens, it makes us all feel as though we’re a part of something bigger, and that at least our voice is being heard and considered, if not agreed with. Especially taking into consideration the day we spoke in class about whether online communities are really communities, I feel as though I can say with certainty that the HERinteractive fanpage is definitely a community. The fact that we’re coming together over one common interest and not only discussing it but pushing for change is exactly what a real life community would do. And while our issues may not be as big or important as those of a real life community of, say, a political kind, the aspects of it are still the same. Our push for change may be something as simple as a remastering of a game, but it can also be something as strong as keeping someone in “power” (such as the woman who voices Nancy that we want to keep) or maybe going so far as to get someone out of power (such as the new management that many fans seemed to disagree with). And although the latter of the two has not yet happened, it’s entirely plausible that it could – just as would happen in a real community where they wish for the person in power to be taken out of it. There are obvious differences from the real world to that of the internet, but from most of what I saw, the differences aren’t quite as big as I may have previously assumed.







And see this? I screenshotted the webpage as soon as I became a member, because they always show who the newest member is - and for about seven minutes, it was me!! robyn.birdie reporting for duty from the Robyn's nest!
You know, learning about all this techy new media stuff is actually really interesting, and I genuinely feel both proud and more intelligent now that I'm learning all these things, even if I am stumbling a bit along the way. But I'm optimistic! Hopefully by week 10 I'll have it all figured out.




Wednesday, May 13, 2015

The Death of the News Story



This morning when I opened my Facebook, I noticed a few things right away:

1) All the hype about the Pats & "Deflategate" really needs to stop. Like, now. They're cheaters, we know. Get over it. Does Sports Il really have nothing better to report on? 

2) I have 8 event invites - for a few seconds, I feel popular....

3) Then I am distracted by the news headlines on the right side of the screen, telling me what's currently trending. Namely, I take notice of the Aaron Rodgers headline, since I am a Packers fan. I hover over the title, and find he has won Celebrity Jeopardy, earning $50,000 for the MACC fund (which, if you don't know about it, is an amazing organization - you can learn more about it here)

Now, the coolest part of this all is that not only did I get to see something about the QB of my favorite team, but I also got to see exactly what the article was about by hovering over it with my mouse. Nowadays, if the entirety of the information of the article isn't already in the title, it's usually always in the first few lines. And after that, people stop reading. If we can get what we need to by doing as little as possible (sound familiar - my last google blog?) then we're going to do it - that's just how our generation is.

Apart from the fact that I can find out the news, or rather what's "trending" as soon as I sign into facebook, what's really great is the fact that what's trending for me, might not be the same as everyone else. And while that may not sound great (actually it sounds kind of terrifying, that everyone is getting different news) it is truly great. Because while the Malaysia Arline Flight and Amtrak stories are probably on most of my friends' newsfeeds, the Aaron Rodgers story might not be, and that's due largely in part to two things:

      • The fact that we live outside of Chicago, where Bears fans couldn't care less about whether or not ARod won Celebrity Jeopardy
and

      • The fact that I am an avid Packers fan, as is obvious by my likes of the Packers FB page, and the Aaron Rodger's FB fan page

So why do these two things affect what I see in my news feed, versus what my friends see? Because, since we live in relatively the same area, we would (theoretically) be getting the same news headlines - except for the fact that I'm from Wisconsin and have liked Packers pages, which Facebook knows, and takes into consideration. Because of my likes, Facebook is able to determine which headlines I would most likely want to see, similar to how Google tries to tailor the results it gives you based off of you past searches, and a variety of other factors. So the reason I say that the news story is dead is because of these combination of factors; the fact that the headline has basically become made to tell the whole story in under ten words, as well as the fact that instead of clicking on the article to learn more (because clicking on an article to actually read it is soo tedious) you can hover over it, and get a few lines of synopsis. It's crazy how simple things have become. Even if a person wants to know the entirety of an article,they're still far more likely to just read the headline and/or synopsis and go on with their day.

Apart from that, the fact that my news is "tailored" to me also skews the concept of a new story. Yes, while what appears in my trending stories are things I usually want to know, that doesn't change the fact that what I'm reading may not always be what would be considered the most "newsworthy". And while large-impact or more well-known events (things such as earthquakes, the riots in Baltimore, the Deflategate scandal, etc.) are almost always shown no matter what, it still skews the lower-scale news that I'm getting, as opposed to my friends. There are times when I'll ask if they saw something trending on their Facebook, and they have no idea what I'm talking about, because occasionally we'll get different trends - and thank God they use the word "trends" instead of "news" because if I were to say the phrase "my friends and I are getting separate news from the internet" that would be a slightly scary thought; but calling them trends makes it seem like just another inevitable part of our "progressive" society. Progressive... riight. God help us all.

Stay trendy, my friends;
- Robyn

Tuesday, May 12, 2015

An Open Letter of Confrustration to Snapchat

Hello again all. And yes, I did make up the word confrustration - it's a combination of confusing and frustrating, and it comes in handy a lot more often than you might think. Feel free to steal it :)

Moving on, in terms of the confrustating new emojis that Snapchat has added to, umm, actually... does anyone have any idea why the hell they actually added them? Because, in reality, all they really seem to be doing is both confusing and frustrating the hell out of all of us. And us millenials (or whatever the older folks are calling us these days) have very short attention spans and tend to not be able to focus or want to work to figure anything out on our own (see my previous post on Google! God that's a funny word, such a long ooooooh sound. Anyhow!) Where was I? Oh yeah, short attention span and laziness when it comes to understanding things. And this, my dear readers, is where I come in to save the daaaaaaay! I'm like Robin, except my name's spelled with a Y, and I don't wear that ridiculous looking costume.

For the help and education of all, I'm here to present to you my research (found through Google!) on what I found out about the meanings of these ridiculous little emojis.

They are as follows:





What does the Yellow Heart emoji mean?
  • This shows up after the name of your number one best friend, the person who you send the most snaps to and who also sends their highest number of snaps to you.

What does the Grimacing Face emoji mean? 
  • Indicates that your number one best friend is also their number one best friend.

What does the Face with Sunglasses emoji mean?
  • One of your best friends is one of their best friends. This means that you both send a crapload of snaps to that one person.

What does the Smirking Face emoji mean?
  • Someone who sends you a lot of snaps, but you don’t send a lot of snaps back to. Not cool, bro.

What does the Smiling Face emoji mean? 
  • A best friend, but not your best best friend.

What does the Fire emoji mean? 
  • This shows that you have begun a “snapstreak” - meaning you've sent this person snaps on consecutive days. If this shows, it will also tell you how many days you’ve kept up the streak.  
Annnd there you are, dear readers. The simplest way I could find to sum up what I found out about the so called "meanings" of these ridiculous emojis - as though they have a real meaning. Although, I mean, when I see my real life best best friend and I'm not their best best friend on Snapchat, I do immediately grow concerned for the state of our relationship, and snapstreak them as much as possible so as to solidify my place in their life. As though Snapchat is totally what determines ones real friends - riiiight people. In the words of Michelle Tanner, "Puuuhhhleaaase". Although, ironically enough, it really doesn't - and yet we still feel as though it does, or at least that it should reflect our real life friends, and we become terrified it it doesn't. I myself am an example of this, as I have been fretting the last two days about my best friend and neighbor of 13 years, and the fact that I'm not her best best friend. Ridiculous, right? I'm pathetic.

Now if you'll excuse me, I have a snapstreak to continue....

Snapplause to all,
- Robyn

Googlization... Yeah, it's a thing - Google it.

Googlization: (n\ˈgü-gələ-ˈzā-shən\
a neologism that describes the expansion of Google's search technologies and aesthetics into more markets, web applications, and contexts, including traditional institutions such as the library.




Yeah so, googlization - that's a thing now. Not only is Google a word, but Googlization is a recently created word, as is evident by the definition above (which, ironically enough, contains a word I had to Google - neologism - which literally means "a new word"... now how fitting)


When exactly did Google even become a word? It's both a noun and a verb to boot - it's got double meanings. Google itself is a thing, but "to google" something is also a thing. When did this all even happen? The irony is that it seems like such a new and crazy concept that it's so popular, and yet, thinking back on my profoundly extensive twenty-two years, I can't even remember a time when I wasn't googling - it's just always been so readily available, and effective. Even in grade school I used it, because teachers would insist that "Wikipedia is not a real source" and that to find the information, we'd have to do real research - party-poopers. But because of this, we were forced to take to Google and find research on our own -- but not really. Because Google did it for us - yes, we had to read all the articles to find the best ones to use, but Google gathered them all together in one place for us to do so. HOW DOES THAT EVEN HAPPEN?! WE COULDN'T EVEN DREAM OF THIS TECHNOLOGY FIFTY YEARS AGO. WHAT EVEN IS LIFE?!


Sorry, but I thought that realization warranted the use of caps-lock. Think about it, honestly, how bizarre it is that we can utilize Google for pretty much anything, and how quick and easy it is to do so. We don't even give it a second thought; in fact, often times when we're simply reading for a class and see a new word (or neologism, rather ;) all we have to do is open a browser window, type in Google, put in the word or phrase we need the definition for, and we're done. I always exit out of it too, as soon as I've read the definition, as if it was barely ever even there. And yet, without it, where would we be? Since teachers still don't consider Wikipedia a viable source, and likely never will, we have to use Google - and without fail, we are always able to find what it is we're looking for, even if we have to go through a hundred pages of results to find it. It's still a hell of a lot faster than it would be without the wonder that is Google. And that, ladies and gents, is called progress. Or Googlization. Googlization works too.


But still, WHAT EVEN IS LIFE THOUGH?


Forever flustered,

- Robyn

Monday, April 20, 2015

To Converge or to Diverge - That is the Question....


Recently there has been a lot of hype in the media world (ten words in and we're already talking about media - that'll help prove my point) about the Divergent film series based off of Veronica Roth's bestselling book series. The entirety of the first film talks about it means to be "divergent", which means to be different from everything else. And while the concept of being unique and different is such a hit with young adult readers these days, we have become anything but divergent. To use the antonym (and word we discussed in class) we have become entirely convergent, going in the exact opposite direction of being "different".

Being the opposite of divergent, convergent means to come together over one united purpose or goal. Essentially this concept is, theoretically, a good one, meaning it causes people to come together over something they believe in. The book and film series Divergent makes the concept of being different than what everyone else wants or believes in as a good thing, but because of the way the media (there's reference #2) has so quickly overtaken our lives, we are more convergent than ever.


In Henry Jenkins' book "Convergence Culture" he argues that the "circulation of media content -- across different media systems, competing media economies, and national borders -- depends heavily on consumer's active participation." And he's completely correct. The importance of the media (there's reference #6; there were three in the quote) and its power comes from the fact that we give it that power and importance - we as the consumers can't do without it. We actively participate in convergence, perhaps without even knowing what it actually means. As Jenkins said, we use media (there's #7) in multiple ways, whether it's through television, computers, tablets, phones, or anything else there might be, and yet it all comes together through these different devices. You can find the same story you saw on the Channel 5 News online, be it through what's "trending" on Facebook, or through the links on your MSN homepage. The media (#8) in all its different forms has come to be an active part of our society, and as Jenkins said, multiple other societies, as it is an international concept. We are the active participants in the rise of the media culture (#9) and whether we're aware of it or not, we will continue to do so. Regardless of if we want to be divergent and different from everyone else, it's nearly impossible to do so nowadays without being attached to some sort of media (#10), whether it's the TV, internet, or otherwise. Without knowing it, we are encouraging and actively making up the population of a convergent society. And as long as we do, we will never be quite as "divergent" as we'd like to think we are.


P.S. Notice the counting of the word media in this post - I kept count to further show the impact and inevitability of media in today's world - it would literally be impossible for me to keep up this blog without it, just as it would be impossible for you to read this without it. Just food for thought.


Remember, you're unique... just like everyone else;
- Robyn

Friday, April 10, 2015

Megan Reardon: Creator Extraordinaire

Among the list of potential interviews, the easiest way I thought to pick one was to browse through each and read the pull-out quotes, and see which ones appealed to me. The quotes are obviously somewhat out of context when you're just reading them as they're pulled out, and not in the full quote itself, but I thought it would at least give me an idea of which blogger I'd either most relate to, or enjoy writing about most, From Megan Reardon's interview, three of her quotes jumped out at me when I read through the interview. Namely, the quote "People are much kinder and weirder than we allow ourselves to be in public." I consider myself to be a little weird, so I really liked the honesty of it. Part of what I think is good about blogging is the ability to be so honest. Also, when Reardon admitted "Honestly, I cannot pretend to know what I'm doing" I related to it. Her saying that was in relation to her photography skills, but the pull-out quote itself, out of context, described exactly how I feel about this whole blog thing - I guess I'm just going to learn as I go along, which is what she seems to have done with photography. 

I also really appreciated that Megan was a crafter and a creator - her desire to expand her horizons from simply knitting to both photography and blogging is wonderful, and also inspiring in its own way, because it's something all creators should want to do - grow in the ways that they create, so that they are able to do so in as many ways as is possible. I'm a big writer, given that English is my major, but blogging is a very different kind of writing, so for me this is out of my comfort zone. I imagine it must be even more so for Megan, given that her original outlet of creativity was knitting, not writing. But, her reasoning for starting a blog isn't necessarily for immense popularity, or even for a following. Rather, she said quite simply "I really just needed a place to keep notes on things I was making." And blogging itself is making something, it's furthering a person's creativity, in a much different way than anything else, even regular creative writing. I think I was drawn to Megan's interview because I do relate so strongly to her, in that she was unsure about how to begin a process such as a blog, but it is a welcome challenge - just another great show of creativity.

Stay Crafty, San Diego;
- Ro(by)n Burgundy